The appellate court found that a trial court's injunction requiring the insurer to continue paying approximately $5000 in additional living expenses was void because 1) the trial court had failed to find that the insured had a viable cause of action; 2) the order failed to set a date for trial on the merits with respect to the relief sought; and 3) the order failed to fix the amount of the security to be paid by the insured.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login