United Fire and Casualty Co. v. Kent Distributors, Inc.

Court: 5th Cir  01/11/2019  Fifth Circuit Affirms Ruling in Favor of Insurer on Duty to Defend and Indemnify Insured with Respect to an Employee's Injury Claims

Court found that allegations fell squarely within the "employer's liability" exclusion and "Texas abuse or molestation" exclusion, giving the term "molest" its commonly understood meaning.

Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login

duty to defendeight corners rulecommercial general liability insurance policycareordinary meaningemployer's liability exclusioncommercial umbrella liability insurance policyTexas abuse or molestation exclusionpunitive or exemplary damages exclusioncustody or control"common meaning

---