Hart v. State Farm Lloyds
A court of the Northern District of Texas granted an insurer's motion for summary judgment in a residential freeze damage dispute, holding that the insured could not meet its burden to prove damages where it offered no expert testimony, but only lay testimony, regarding the reasonable cost of repair.
homeowner's policy, lay testimony, expert testimony, FRE 702, Winter Storm Uri
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login
Deprecated: preg_split(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($subject) of type string is deprecated in /home/o4339n8d6x7h/public_html/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 3506