skip to Main Content

Frederking v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.

Court: WD Tx  05/20/2020  Federal District Court Denies Motion for Reconsideration in Regard to Lack of Coverage for Punitive Damages Award

The district court found that it did not improperly shift the burden of proof on summary judgment and properly applied the Supreme Court of Texas' ruling in Fairfield v. Stephens Martin Paving regarding the state's public policy in allowing insurance coverage for punitive damages awards.

automobile liability insurance policy, motion to dismiss, motion for reconsideration, punitive damages, public policy, Rule 59(e), burden of proof, summary judgment, Fairfield v. Stephens Martin Paving

Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login




ILS Login

Forgot Password?

Join Us

Password Reset
Please enter your e-mail address. You will receive a new password via e-mail.

Back To Top