The Insurance Law Section is an official, sanctioned section of the State Bar of Texas consisting of approximately 2,300 members. Membership is open to all members of the State Bar of Texas.
Our Mission: Promoting collegiality and educating the bench, bar, and public about Texas insurance law.
Join The Section
The Insurance Law Section is governed by a Council elected from the Section membership at the Section’s annual meeting. Section officers are elected from and by the Council
Recent Decisions
Tchakarov v. Allstate Indemnity Co.
Court: ND Tx 10/22/2021
Court Grants Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment on All Claims For Failure to Segregate Loss
Nabors Drilling Technologies v. Deepwell Energy Services, LLC
Court: SD Tx 10/21/2021
Court Applies Northfield Exception in Ruling That Insurer Owes Duty to Defend Additional Insured
Vernon v. Palomar Specialty Insurance Co.
Court: ED Tx 10/20/2021
District Court Denies Remand Due to Improper Joinder of In-State Defendants
Covington Specialty Insurance Co. v. USAI LP
Court: 5th Cir 10/20/2021
Fifth Circuit Holds Auto Exclusion Does Not Preclude Duty to Defend Claims Involving Vehicle Swept Away By Flood
Abedinia v. Lighthouse Property Insurance Co.
Court: Tx 12-Tyler 10/20/2021
Court Affirms Judgment for Insurer on Limitations Grounds
Finger Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.
Court: WD Tx 10/20/2021
Magistrate Grants Dismissal of Most Claims Resulting from Well Blow-out
Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Ford
Court: Tx 5-Dallas 10/15/2021
Court Reverses Sanctions Order Against UIM Insurer
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dominguez
Court: ND Tx 10/12/2021
Driver's Injuries Caused By Chasing Runaway Truck Resulted From Use of Auto
Aspen Specialty Insurance Co. v. Yin Investments USA, LP
Court: ED Tx 10/07/2021
District Court Dismisses Extra-Contractual Claims But Finds Issue of Fact on Contractual Claims in Property Insurance Dispute
Risinger Holdings, LLC v. Sentinel Insurance Co.
Court: ED Tx 09/30/2021
District Court Dismisses Incorrect Insurer But Grants Leave to Replead in Virus Exclusion Dispute