Insured roofer under commercial general liability policy was sued in state court for fire damage arising out of roofing work, and, after its insurer filed a declaratory judgment action that it had no duty to defend the insured based on application of the policy's Roof Limitation Endorsement, the insured filed a motion to dismiss under the abstention doctrine, which a court of the Northern District of Texas denied because all of the Trejo factors weighed against abstention.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login