The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Chajon

Court: Tx Sup  07/31/2017  Northern District Grants Insurers Motion for Summary Judgment under Broadened Employer's Liability Exclusion

Court refuses to consider extrinsic evidence and denies the insured's request for time for additional discovery under Rule 54(d), finding the pleadings allegations sufficient to determine a lack of coverage.

Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login

exclusionbodily injury to contractors&#039no duty to indemnifyor subcontractors&#039commercial general liability insurance policyexception to &quotno duty to defendRule 54(d) motionbodily injuryplausible basis for belief that additional discovery will influence outcome of summary judgmetn motionsemployer&#039&quotindependent contractorduty to defendemployeeemployees&quotTrejo factorseight corners&quotmotion to stayrules liability exclusion

---