The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals under an "Erie guess" affirmed dismissal by the district court of claims by insured restaurant for business interruption losses resulting from COVID-19 government shutdown orders, finding coverage under commercial property policy was limited to suspension of operations "caused by direct physical loss of or damage to property at the premises" but that "nothing physical or tangible happened to [the insured's] restaurants at all" where physical loss requires a "distinct, demonstrable, physical alteration of the property," and further held that the policy's "restaurant extension endorsement" did not provide coverage for the losses because the shutdown orders did not result from "the actual or alleged exposure of the...premises to a contagious or infectious disease" as required by the policy, and "perceiv[ing] no set of facts in which [the insured] states a covered claim for its losses" held that the district court did not err in denying leave to amend.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login