Searcy v. Progressive Insurance
A court of the Northern District of Texas granted an insurer's motion to dismiss, holding that the court lacked jurisdiction where the plaintiff had failed to establish diversity among the parties and standing where the plaintiff alleged federal hate crimes and perjury against the insurer.
auto policy, third-party claimant, hate crime, subject matter jurisdiction, perjury, diversity jurisdiction, amount in controversy requirement, FRCP 12(b)(1)
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login