The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court, holding that supplier did not qualify as an additional insured under trucking carrier's business auto policy because the blanket additional insured endorsement limited additional insured's status "only to the extent of" the named insured's negligence, and because the putative additional insured was seeking coverage for its own negligence, the insurer owed it no duties to defend or indemnify.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login