Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
Though excess policy provided excess carrier owed no duty to defend, a Texas appellate court affirmed the trial court's summary judgment that excess insurer owed insured reimbursement of defense costs where primary policy covered defense costs and excess policy "followed form."
follow form, excess policy, primary policy, ambiguity, defense costs, duty to defend
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login