Mihal v. Geico
The Court found that the district court erred when it held that attorneys' fees were precluded as a matter of law when an insured brings a claim for UIM benefits in a declaratory judgment action and remanded the case to the trial court for consideration of whether an award of attorneys' fees would be equitable and just under the circumstances.
auto insurance, UM, UIM, underinsured, uninsured, attorneys' fees, declaratory judgment,
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login