Skip to content

Marco Z. v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co.

Court: WD Tx  11/04/2020  Conflict Preemption Requires Dismissal of ERISA Beneficiary's State Law Claims; Leave to Amend Granted

A court of the Western District of Texas granted a health insurer's motion to dismiss all of a beneficiary's state law claims based on the conflict-preemption doctrine, finding claims under an ERISA plan superseded all the beneficiary's state law claims, but the court allowed the claimant leave to amend his complaint to assert a plausible claim under ERISA.

Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login

Back To Top

Forgot Password?

Join Us