In Re State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.
The appellate court concluded that the order for a new trial was facially invalid because the order did not contain any specific, articulated reason for why a new trial would be legally appropriate and further, the relator had no adequate remedy on appeal because it would lose the benefit of a final judgment based on the first jury verdict.
auto insurance, UM, UIM, underinsured, uninsured, attorneys' fees, waiver, new trial, mandamus, facial validity, reasonably specific explanation, adequate remedy,
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login