Fish Construction, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co.
The court found that the proposed intervenor failed to establish that its interest would be impaired if it was not a party as the intervenor and the insured share the same objective. Moreover, the proposed intervenor did not overcome the presumption that its interests would be adequately represented by the insured.
commercial property insurance policy, motion to intervene, public adjuster, breach of contract, FRCP 24(a)(2)
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login