Firmus Management And Construction LLC v. Third Coast Insurance Co.
A magistrate of the Western District of Texas denied an insurer's motion to strike and exclude the testimony of a forensic accountant, holding that although the accountant's methodology appears to have certain flaws, those flaws have not infected the methodology with known error, and that the testimony remains admissible under Rule 702.
commercial property policy, Winter Storm Uri, forensic accountant, FRE 702, business interruption, accounting, forensic accounting
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login