skip to Main Content

Yasenyev v. Cottingham & Butler Claim Services, Inc.

Court: SD Tx  06/20/2020  District Court Denies Motion to Remand in UIM Coverage Dispute

The court determined that the Federal Rules dictate the determination of subject matter jurisdiction at the time of removal, and, at that time, the insured sought more than $75,000 in damages; thus, a later filed amended petition could not terminate jurisdiction.

automobile liability insurance policy, underinsured motorist, UIM, motion to remand, amount in controversy, subject matter jurisdiction

Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login

Back To Top

Forgot Password?

Join Us