A Texas court of appeals reversed a judgment in favor of a defendant insurance agency's limitations defense where the agency's procurement of an occurrence-based policy following a claims-made policy created a gap in coverage, holding that the trial court erred when it granted the agency's motion for summary judgment on its limitations defense because a fact issue precluded judgment as a matter of law on the insured's equitable estoppel avoidance.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login