Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.

Court: WD Tx  07/05/2018  Magistrate Judge Finds a Co-Insurer Owes a Duty to Defend a Mutual Insured Despite Lack of Specificity of Factual Allegations

Magistrate Judge recommended that the District Judge find a duty to defend existed because "property damage" at least potentially was alleged, and none of the exclusions raised by the insurer operated to negate the duty to defend under the "eight corners" rule.

Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login

breach of contractcommercial general liability policyproperty damagedefective workexclusions j.(5) and j.(6)exclusion l."your work"duty to defend

---