The Court found that the insured was not entitled to replacement of her entire roof because only a portion actually suffered "physical loss," but the insured did present sufficient evidence of a fact issue pertaining to interior damage to the home, as well as a fact issue as to whether the insurer violated Chapter 542 of the Texas Insurance Code. No bad faith or other extracontractual claims survived because there was a bona fide dispute as to the amount necessary to cover the loss.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login