A Texas appellate court justice dissented from a holding that reversed and remanded a trial court order certifying a class of PIP claimants seeking interest and attorneys' fees under the Prompt Payment of Claims Act, arguing that the class certification order was proper because the legal disputes that the majority held were inadequately addressed were either adequately addressed in the trial court's order or were addressed in the majority's holding that the insurer's failure to accept coverage, reject coverage, or request more information within fifteen business days under Tex. Ins. Code Sec. 542.056 is not a legally baseless.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login