A court of the Western District of Texas denied auto insurer's motion to dismiss an insured's claims for UIM benefits, finding that an insured can litigate the issue of UIM coverage via a declaratory judgment action without first obtaining a judgment against the tortfeasor, but the court held that the insured's extracontractual claims should be abated where success of such claims is largely contingent on the UIM liability judgment.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login