In re Garrison Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
The court found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in compelling the deposition of the insurer's corporate representative, but the court of appeals agreed that the deposition should be narrowly focused in scope to matters relevant to damages and the insurer's defenses.
automobile insurance policy, uninsured motorist, underinsured motorist, UM, UIM, deposition of a corporate representative, motion to compel, abuse of discretion
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login