The court affirmed the magistrate judge's grant of an insurer's motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of insured's contractual and extra-contractual claims in hail dispute, finding that the insured's sole objection--that the magistrate judge erred in finding that the insurer conducted a reasonable investigation--lacked factual support in light of the insurer's multiple inspections of the property in question.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login