A magistrate of the Eastern District of Texas denied an insurer's motion to exclude an insured's testifying experts in a hail damage dispute, holding that the experts were qualified to opine on whether the useful service life of metal roofing had been reduced by hail and that the insurer's argument that the experts cannot opine on whether overhead and profit are owed is more appropriate for a motion for summary judgment rather than an objection under Rule 702.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login