Gray v. Minnesota Life Insurance Co.

Court: SD Tx  06/25/2021  District Court Denies Insured's Motion to Amend Decision and for New Trial

The district court found that the insured did not present any evidence of a manifest error in law or fact to warrant granting of her motion under either Rule 59(a) or Rule 52(b) in dispute over accidental death and dismemberment benefits.

Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login

ERISAlife insurance policymotion for new trialfull and fair reviewmanifest erroraccidental death and dismemberment coveragemotion to amend findings of fact and conclusions of lawadministrative recordFRCP 59FRCP 52

---