Granting insured's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment and/or for Reconsideration, a Court of the Northern District of Texas held that it did not commit manifest error in granting a property insurer's motion for summary judgment on grounds that the insured could not meet its burden to allocate damages to property period where evidence was insufficient to demonstrate damage resulted from storm during insurer's policy period but that newly discovered evidence of testimony concerning the condition of the roof prior to the policy period created a genuine dispute of material fact.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login