Fannin v. United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
District Court affirms magistrate's determination that two cases filed by the same insured for different claims could not be aggregated for purposes of determining amount in controversy and that stipulation that the insured would not accept an award in excess of the jurisdictional limiit was sufficient to warrant remand.
homeowner's insurance policy, diversity jurisdiction, motion to remand, amount in controversy, stipulation, aggregation
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login