A court of the Northern District of Texas resolved competing motions for summary judgment in an excess insurer's Stowers suit against a primary insurer, denying the primary insurer's motion where the record included evidence that a reasonable insurer would have accepted the underlying plaintiff's settlement offers at or below the primary policy's limit and denying the excess insurer's motion seeking recovery of judgment interest and court costs from the underlying litigation.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login