Bermudez v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America
The court, noting that a motion to reconsider is not something found in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, nevertheless considered the motion and rejected any argument that the court manifestly erred in its improper joinder analysis when it denied the insureds' motion to remand.
commercial property insurance policy, removal, motion to remand, motion for reconsideration, improper joinder, Smallwood, Twombly, Iqbal, FRCP 12(b)(6)
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login